Rights Gazette

Rights Digest

General

Media Rights

ASA rulings

Free Speech

Burning Issues

International Bits

Research

Skinner

About Pacific Breeze

Subscribe

Unsubscribe

Advertise Here

Search

Advertising Rights Digest - Arm yourself with knowledge

Published on 12 May 2011


Final FIFA Barometer - Legal lessons
By Willem Krog
21 Jul 2010

Latest News

Assessing the legal lessons of the FIFA World Cup involuntarily evokes the Biblical story of Esau who sold his birthright for a pot of lentil soup. From a legal point of view that was what the South African Government and the Host Cities did to the South African population.

They adopted draconian legislation - directly in defiance of our Constitution - and relied on our gratitude not to raise our voices against the legal issues in question. Legally speaking, we were held hostage by FIFA in return for hosting the championship.

Lesson 1
A free and democratic country cannot enter into agreements with a "non-profit"� organisation to promulgate laws drafted and set by that organisation which fly in the face of our Constitution.

An example is the Host City by-laws which were draconian and drafted by FIFA. Any city that refused to promulgate these by-laws (such as Cape Town) was threatened to either adapt or lose its host city status. There is no doubt that such actions by a host city is fundamentally unconstitutional and would have been struck down by a court.

Another example is the notice in terms of the Merchandise and Marks Act which prohibits the use of any words FIFA could conjure up, such as "SA 2010"� etc. It effectively prohibits South African from associating with the event. If you want to associate, you must pay-up said FIFA. The tournament is in this country: for Gods sake, we cannot but associate with it!

Lesson 2
Legal threats are a form of marketing. If you continue long and hard enough with it, everybody will start believing they are real. And they were not. It was hot air all the way - and we fell for it. One is still awaiting reports of the special courts prosecuting anybody for contravening FIFA marketing or advertising directives. Besides the two Dutch girls whose human rights were trampled upon, there were a lot of Gestapo-type threats, but there will not be a single case making it to the courts.



[ Back ]


Bookmark and Share
 
pb

Copyright 2018 Pacific Breeze 353 (Pty) Ltd, Rights Gazette & OJB Web Development.

DMMA

All rights reserved. Rights Gazette encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on Rights Gazette are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Rights Gazette. Rights Gazette, its sponsors, contributors and advertisers disclaim all liability for any loss, damage, injury or expense that might arise from the use of, or reliance upon, the services contained herein.

For Advertising inquiries, click here.